Skip to main content

My modelling the end of covid-19 pandemic

The UK: There are people currently residing in the country, numbering (or indexed) from 1, 2, …., N. 

This population is partitioned into two: those that have been tested (E) and those that are yet to be tested (Y).

It follows that N = E + Y;  N.

K is number of confirmed cases, so that K < E.

There are K = 52k+ confirmed cases in the UK as of April 7. But this figure is less than the total actual number of infected persons in the country, which can be known by testing everybody in the country.

If we assumed that the physical distancing preventive measure works out perfectly so that there are no more cases of person-person transmission, then the daily number of confirmed cases will still be rising as long as the entire population is still being tested.

It is assumed that all the borders in the country are closed: there are no travellers entering in and leaving the country.

If the entire population is tested, then the total number of infected persons in the country will be X [= 41k + Y], where Y is the fraction that tested positive at date T = is the date in which the country has tested the Nth person, i.e. 100% of its population.

X is divided into two: R (fraction that recovered from the virus) and D (fraction that did not).

At the moment 0 < [C =D/R] < 1 because not all that are infected by the virus will eventually be killed by the virus.     
C = case fatality ratio

The goal of the healthcare system is to minimise the value of C, i.e. tending it towards zero which is equivalent to maximising recovery rate, R.

Since person-to-person transmission is assumed to be zero, we have,  
C = f (X, H, U), H = measures the robustness of the healthcare system (e.g. medical supplies, doctors, nurses and other medics) in responding to covid-19 patients, and U = a vector of individual characteristics of covid-19 carriers (e.g. age, initial medical conditions, etc).

If L is the covid-19 lifespan in human bodies (i.e. the time it will take for a patient to recover if the patient will survive, and the time it will take to kill a patient if the patient will not survive the virus), then the average of L over X is the expected duration by which the virus will be wiped out of humans in the country.

Limitations: some of the assumptions are not feasible: E.g., people will still go out, shopping and offering essential services. These are channels of transmission.

2nd, it may not be possible for the UK to test over 60 million of its population.

Blog by @dapelzg

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

On the emergence of COVID-19 vaccines

As scientists across the globe race towards finding a cure for the COVID-19 so are conspiracy theorists churning out suppositions and spreading misgivings about potential vaccines and treatments. Recently, a video on a forthcoming COVID-19 vaccine has been circulating on social media. Perhaps, like me, you’ve received it from many people. In it, is a claim of a so-called hidden sinister agenda of Bill Gates. That Mr Gates is laying the groundwork for the coming of the anti-Christ by veiling a micro-chip into human bodies in the name of administering a covid-19 vaccine. I don't believe this. Here's what I believe: I firmly believe that believers in Christ should be instruments in God’s hand in brightening the world and salting the earth: preaching the gospel, interceding for all men, seeking and saving the lost through the power of the cross that raised Jesus from the dead. I also believe that the mark of the beast will be issued after the trumpet has sounded and believers ar

FANS AND CRITICS

Whoever you are and no matter what you do in life, you may have fans and critics. Listen to them both. WHY?  Your fans will always praise you, give you some encouragement, cheer you up, say good things of you to you and to others, motivate and bring out more of the potential you have to improve what you are doing. Because they are your great admirers, they will hardly bear ill-feelings towards you. BUT,  Anytime you screw up or make mistakes in life, they will hardly point at your errors. Their role at this point comes to an end. NOW,  Your critics take over. Hear what they are saying about you. Even though some of them maybe driven by envy, jealousy, resentment, spirit of competition or bitterness, they can be great instruments in shaping you. They keep you human, humble, repealing every root of pride that may spring up within you.  They make you sit up and somehow, they can spur you to greater heights in life. HOWEVER, REMEMBER,  They may never motivate

Nigeria’s best head of state since independence?

From the first decade of its independence to date, Nigeria has so far been led by 12 heads of state. Nine of them were in power for at least more than two years. Which of them was the best? And how is this measured?  I answer these questions using just two economic variables: GDP growth rate and the price of oil.  Let’s plough through the numbers as we shovel out some stylized facts (depicted in the chart below. To view higher resolution version of the chart, please click here  or here ):   President Jonathan (in power from 2010 - 2015) had the highest oil price and Gen Gowon the lowest.  President Yar’adua  (2007 - 2010) had the highest growth rate and Shagari the lowest followed by Buhari.  President  Buhari  (2015 - 2019) is having the 3rd highest oil price, 11 times Gen Gowon's.  Gen Gowon  (1966 - 1975) recorded the 3rd highest growth rate, 15 times Buhari's (2nd lowest). However, Buhari has a few years left to improv